|
9/11 - We
Should Have Known
Circa
September 12, 2012
Majid Ali, M.D.
We should have known. I put these
simple words on the back cover of my book September
11, 2005 (2002). I published this book as a book of
predictions written in a fictionalized past tense.
The medical consequences of the Ground Zero were
utterly predictable. And I predicted the predictable
in full detail.
Basis of
Predictions
We Should have Known! I used the
words to express my certainty about the health
consequences of 9/11 dust in clear light of my
Oxygen Model of Disease. Specifically, I based my
predictyions on the following:
* First, no part can be
understood without understanding its
relationships with the whole—the Darwin
Principle is my designation for this—and so
relatedness of natural phenomena must be the
basis of all efforts to understand and treat
all diseases;
* Second, oxygen is the
organizing principle of human biology and
governs all healing in the body—all relevant
oxygen issues must be addressed in all
diseases for best long-term results;
* Third, each individual
is a unique person and requires an
individualized clinical care with
application of the principles of relatedness
and The Oxygen Model of Disease.
Four
Objectives
I had clear objectives in penning
September 11, 2005.
* First, to state what I
saw as entirely predictable: the terror of
9/11 will turn into toxicity, and toxicity
of the inferno will turn into terror. The
toxicity and terror will fan each other's
fires to sicken an enormous number of
people.
* Second, the people made
ill by the 9/11 events will be monitored
with registries—some of them literally to
their deaths.
* Third, New York doctors
will treat illnesses caused by chemical
toxins with yet more chemicals—drugs that
will offer temporary benefits but will not
address the underlying problems.
* Fourth, the lessons
concerning the cumulative effects of terror
and toxicity will not be learned.
Regrettably, all my predictions came to
pass. I survey the records of the last ten
years to document that.
Lessons Not
Learned from 9/11
Here is some text from my 2011
article in which I raised what I consider to be the
central issue; "There are two profound ironies in
the [medical] annals of 9/11-related breathing
disorders. First, a doctor on center stage who
should have foreseen the grave and imminent dangers
of 9/11 dust—a lung specialist—completely failed to
do so. Second, this doctor could have played the
perfect part in the prevention of considerable
preventable lung injury—being the Deputy Medical
Officer of the New York City Fire Department—but
completely neglected his ethical responsibilities of
assuring optimal nutritional and detox needs of the
firemen sickened firemen by the consequences of 9/11
dust. He fully participated in the wide-ranging acts
of denying the rescue workers sorely needed
nutritional and detox therapies. Seven years later,
he claimed that no one could have predicted the
scale of suffering. That is a brazen distortion of
the facts. In 2002, in my book September 11, 2005 I
did exactly that. 1 I reproduce text from this book
to show how clearly I forecasted the 9/11-related
breathing problems seven years earlier
Seven-Segment 9/11-Tenth
Anniversary Series
On the tenth anniversary of September 11, 2001, I
focused on the dark and shameful medical legacy of
9/11 apocalypse by posting on the Web of a 7-segment
series entitled "9/11-Tenth Anniversary Series. I
considered it important to documen t what I called
"shameful medical neglect" for those who might
re-visit this national tragedy in years to come. The
series includes the following:
9/11 — A Tragic Story of Neglected
Ethics—the Unrecognized Oxygen-9/11 Connection"
2. 9/11 — The Sordid Untold Story of 9/11 Toxicity,
Politicians, and the City’s Medical Examiner
3. 9/11 — Dust, Air-hungry People, and the City’s
Lung Specialist
4. 9/11 — Toxicity and Lapdog Joes of New York
Magazine
5. 9/11 — Lessons Unlearned and Lapdog Joes of The
New York Times
6. 9/11 — Lesson Unlearned and Lapdog Joes of The
New England Journal of Medicine
7. 9/11 — Do We Need Special Autopsy Standards for
Suspected 9/11-Related Deaths?
Related
Reports
*
Environmental Health
*
9/11 — A Tragic Story of
Neglected Ethics
* The Untold
Story of 9/11 Toxicity, Politicians, and the City’s
Medical Examiner
*
9/11 Dust, Air
Hunger, and City’s Lung Specialist
*
9/11 Toxicity and
Lapdog Journalists of New York Magazine
*
9/11 —
Lapdog Joes of The New York Times
*
9/11
— Lesson Unlearned and Lapdog Joes of The New
England Journal of Medicine
*
Do We Need Special
Autopsy Standards for Suspected 9/11-Related Deaths?
*
9/11 - We Should Have Known
- Circa September 12, 2012
END
|
